A Message from the CEO
There is a great deal of impactful work underway across bedding stewardship. One issue now sits above everything else: responsibility for the products the bedding industry places on the Australian market.
I want to speak plainly about where the industry stands and what must happen next.
Moving Australia’s bedding sector from a linear model to a circular one is a significant undertaking. It requires investment, collaboration and changes to how products are designed, sold, recovered, reused and recycled.
The ABSC and its members are making progress. During FY26, our approved recycler network processed more than 1.1 million mattresses. Mattress recycling commenced in Tasmania, and we have worked to improve access across Central and Northern Queensland.
That progress has not been without setbacks. One regional Queensland recycler has already closed, highlighting just how fragile recycling services can be when operating costs are high and viable markets for recovered materials remain limited.
We have also strengthened data and reporting, developed practical tools for members and continued work to create stronger markets for recovered materials.
Reuse is becoming a greater part of the solution. Many mattresses have been diverted to people in need through ABSC-facilitated reuse programs, while Better Bedding for Hotels and Top of Bed are creating further pathways for products and materials that have traditionally gone straight to landfill.
Our members should be proud of that progress. The strong FY27 renewal response demonstrates continued confidence in the scheme.
This current position is not fair, and it is not sustainable.
Every mattress sold in Australia will eventually require reuse, recovery, or disposal. That cost does not disappear when the product leaves the store or arrives at a customer’s door.
When a business places bedding products on the Australian market without contributing to their end-of-life management, someone else pays. The burden falls on local councils, recyclers, Australian taxpayers and the businesses already funding the scheme.
Our current membership base should not continue to carry an obligation created by the entire market.